|
|
New York City Council Transportation Committee Hearing: Traffic Enforcement, 15 MPH Neighborhood Streets, Community Requests for Traffic CalmingTestimony DateSeptember 27, 1995
Good afternoon. My name is Paul
Harrison, and I represent Transportation Alternatives, New York City's 3,500
member citizens group working for better walking, cycling and mass transit. I am
here today to ask for three things: New York is America's Walking City, yet last year, 249 pedestrians were killed, and 35 a day were sent to the hospital after getting hit by motor vehicles. A pedestrian in New York City is twice as likely to get hit crossing with the walk signal than against it. New York's pedestrians are dying at a rate much higher than that of other similar world class cities like London and Tokyo because NYC streets are designed to move motor vehicle traffic, not pedestrian traffic. Traffic signals are timed for motor traffic, not walkers and police enforcement is minimal and motorists don't yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk. This must stop. We urge the council to endorse the use of Traffic Calming, a form of traffic engineering that would make our dangerous intersections much safer to cross and relieve our neighborhoods from the effect of too much speeding and through traffic. The number one cause of death and injury for New York City children ages 5-14 is getting hit by a car. Transportation Alternatives
strongly supports strict enforcement of traffic laws. We've spoken to the
council before on this topic, especially on the subjects of dangerous cabbies
and scofflaw drivers. Although traffic enforcement is vital, but the police can
not be everywhere at once. That's why we challenge this committee and the
Council to learn about traffic calming and to promote it. This summer a new
coalition of community groups and block associations was formed, called the
Neighborhood Streets Network. It has four city-wide policy goals: I've brought with me today a draft resolution that would request that the DOT use traffic calming with community participation and bill language that would set NYC's residential side street speed limit at 15 mph. It's crazy that the speed limit on Manhattan's First Avenue is the same as on quiet, residential streets around the city. Cities known for their quality
of life, like Seattle, Portland and Boulder use and promote traffic calming. New
York City is falling behind and we need to catch up. These resolutions tie in well to the Council's interest in reigning in the anarchy on our streets. Transportation Alternatives strongly supports today's Resolution 332 as a first step and looks forward to providing whatever assistance we can to the council in its efforts to stop dangerous driving. But, the neglected aspect of traffic safety is roadway design. The council, and chairman Dear, have expressed interest in signal timing. Even if we re-time lights, our dangerous intersections will remain dangerous. The physical design of an intersection has a much stronger impact. Take the example of 59th and 7th, where two women died under wheels of a laundry truck earlier this summer. The intersection would be safer if redesigned using engineering methods like sidewalk extensions. If sidewalk extensions had been in place, which extend the sidewalk into the parking lane at the crosswalk, these women would have had 18 to 20 fewer feet to cross and the truck driver would have had to make a sharper, slower turn. It's likely that these two women would have been with us today. NYC is lagging far behind in protecting its pedestrians and neighborhoods from motor vehicles. America's Walking City is a place where neighborhood quality of life is very important. 56% of us don't own cars and even those that do are dependent on walking and transit. To not have traffic calming here is unacceptable--communities want it, the council should hold a hearing on it and pass a resolution asking the DOT to use traffic calming when communities ask for it.
Submitted by rick on February 6, 2008 - 15:27. categories [ ]
|