Hometransalt.org
Bicycle Blueprint
Introduction

NYC Cycling
1. NYC Bike Policy
2. State of NYC Cycling
3. Cyclists & Streets
A Bike and a Prayer


Riding Infrastructure
4. Street Design
5. Bridges
6. Road Surfaces
7. Greenways
8. Parks
9. Bicycles and Transit
10. Reducing Traffic


Security
11. Bicycle Theft
12. On-Street Parking
13. Indoor Parking


On the Job Cycling
14. Bicycle Messengers
Fifth, Park & Madison
15. Freight Cycles
16. Gov't Cycling


Reducing Risks
17. Accidents
Three Who Died
18. Air Pollution


Bicycle Education
19. Schools
20. Public Education


Appendices

      Appendix C:
Auto-Free New York 4-Year Plan
APPENDIX A. Immediate Steps to Increase Bicycling in New York City
APPENDIX B. Bicycling Levels in New York City
• Table 1: Bicycles Account for 8.6% of Midtown Avenue Traffic, 1988-1992
• Table 2: Daily Bicycle Trips in New York City
APPENDIX C. Auto-Free NY 4-Year Plan
• Table 3: Elements of the Auto-Free NY 4-Year Plan

Auto-Free New York 4-Year Plan

In April 1990, as its contribution to the 20th anniversary of Earth Day, the Auto-Free NY Committee of Transportation Alternatives published Fewer Cars, A More Livable City, a 4-year plan intended to reduce auto use by 20% in the Manhattan Central Business District and by 5% citywide. The plan was prepared by AFNY founder George Haikalis, and was presented at numerous agency meetings and civic forums, including the First International Conference for Auto-Free Cities convened by T.A. at NYU in May 1991. It was featured in the May/June 1990 and Nov/Dec 1990 issues of Auto-Free Press, with over 20,000 copies distributed.

The plan's greatest contribution was not in its individual features — many were contained in other proposals made through the years — but in its integration. To begin, the plan proposed five key strategies to make the City's rich resource of public transit services work better. The most dramatic — unlimited ride, time-based passes — would make the transit system “free” to subscribers. These passes would eliminate double fares for bus/subway trips and let transit riders make better use of the commuter rail system.

The transit strategies were doable in the short term, but at considerable cost. Accordingly, three of the five traffic reduction strategies were pricing disincentives; these would not only reduce auto use but would generate the revenues needed to finance the transit improvements. The revenue measures included higher gas taxes, bridge tolls, increased parking fees and a tax on medallion taxi trips.

The third group of strategies related to auto-free streets — Auto-Free NY's raison d'être. Busy commercial streets in the core and in outlying business districts were proposed to be made auto-free, backed up by better transit service and auto restraint strategies. Some key vehicular streets would be closed to produce an interconnected network of greenways throughout the city, and through traffic would be removed from neighborhood streets.

Since the plan was published, the Dinkins Administration has floated various proposals that have included some of the plan's most controversial elements, like bridge tolls and higher gas taxes. Lacking, however, is a coherent, comprehensive vision that not only links the various elements but also could make the plan attractive and meaningful to New Yorkers.

Elements of the Auto-Free NY 4-Year Plan

  1. Drastically Improve Transit
    1. Nearly “Free” Transit Service
    2. (Almost) Waitless Transit
    3. Penn Station Metro-Hub
    4. A Station in Every Backyard
    5. Get Home Safely
  2. Reduce Auto Travel 20% in Manhattan, 5% Citywide
    1. “Non-stop” Tolls
    2. Park 'n Pay in Manhattan
    3. Parking “Lid” in City
    4. Upstream Traffic Restraint
    5. Tax on Taxis
  3. Create Network of Auto-Free Streets
    1. Green Grid in Manhattan
    2. Better Business in the Boroughs
    3. Citywide Greenway Network
    4. Green Neighborhoods
    5. Green Vehicles
How the Strategies Support Each Other
  • Better service attracts motorists to transit, but improvements and fare innovations cost money.
  • Pricing strategies to reduce auto use produce revenues to improve public transit.
  • Reduced traffic allows a shift in street space to pedestrians, cyclists and urban amenities.
  • Improved public environment encourages travel by transit and non-motorized modes.
  • Reduced auto traffic lets essential commercial traffic move more efficiently, strengthening the city's economy.
  • Financing transit fares and better service through auto-use chargesbenefits all New Yorkers — especially those with limited incomes who cannot afford autos.

For a complete copy of the 4-Year Plan for Fewer Cars, A More Livable City, send a SASE to: 4-Year Plan, at the address below.

© 1997-2009 Transportation Alternatives
127 West 26th Street, Suite 1002
New York, NY 10001